Comparison of infrared spectroscopy and laser granulometry as alternative methods to estimate soil aggregate stability in Mediterranean badlands - INRAE - Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Geoderma Année : 2016

Comparison of infrared spectroscopy and laser granulometry as alternative methods to estimate soil aggregate stability in Mediterranean badlands

Résumé

Soil aggregate stability is a key indicator of soil resistance to erosion, but its measurement remains fastidious for large scale uses. Alternative time and cost-effective methods are thus needed. Our objective was to assess and compare the efficiency of laser granulometry (LG) and soil mid- and near-infrared spectroscopy (MIR/NIR) as alternative methods to assess soil aggregate stability in Mediterranean badland soils. A collection of 75 badland soil samples was used, showing wide variations in soil aggregate stability. Three different categories of measurements were performed: (i) the aggregate breakdown kinetics of the [< 1 mm] size fraction under stirring and sonication, tracked by repeated particle size distribution measurements, using LG, (ii) mid-(diffuse-MIR-DR and attenuate transmitted reflectance — MIR-ATR) and near-(NIR-DR) infrared spectra of the fine soil fraction [< 2 mm] and (iii) the soil aggregate [3–5 mm] stability, using the standardized method (ISO/FDIS 10930, 2012). Partial least squares regression models were used to predict soil aggregate stability using LG data and infrared spectra. Results showed that NIR-DR and MIR-ATR data provided the best prediction model for soil aggregate stability values (RPD = 2.61 & 2.74; R2 = 0.85 & 0.87), followed by MIR-DR data (RPD = 2.24; R2 = 0.89) and finally LG data (RPD = 2.12; R2 = 0.80). For a quantitative use of the models to assign soil samples to standardized soil aggregate stability classes (ISO/FDIS 10930, 2012), infrared spectra also provided the best accuracy, with a misclassification rate below 30% for NIR-DR and MIR-ATR models, while it reached 43% with the LG-based model. The combination of IR and LG data did not yield a better prediction model for soil aggregate stability values and classes. Infrared-based method also provided best results in terms of time-saving strategy, reducing the measurement time to 8 min only. To conclude, infrared spectra (NIR-DR and MIR-ATR) outperformed LG-data to predict soil aggregate stability. Further development of this technique would require calibrating a set of soil-type specific prediction models for a wide range of soil types.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-01837323 , version 1 (12-07-2018)

Identifiants

Citer

Amandine Erktan, Cédric Legout, Sébastien de Danieli, Nathan Daumergue, Lauric Cécillon. Comparison of infrared spectroscopy and laser granulometry as alternative methods to estimate soil aggregate stability in Mediterranean badlands. Geoderma, 2016, 271, pp.225-233. ⟨10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.025⟩. ⟨hal-01837323⟩
72 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More